A STUDY ON BIOCHEMISTRY EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS AND DETERMINANTS OF PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES IN CLINICAL LABORATORIES IN VIETNAM

Authors

  • Van Hy Triet
  • Nguyen Thanh Liem
  • Van Thi Thanh Thuy
  • Le Thanh Tung
  • Dau Thi Xuyen
  • Bui Thi Le Xuan
  • Tran Van Tinh
  • Nguyen Thi Thuy
  • Nguyen Khanh Cuong
  • Nguyen Quoc Bao
  • Tran Le Anh Khoa
  • Nguyen Duc Phu
  • Huynh Thi Diem Phuc
  • Nguyen Tien Huynh

Keywords

clinical biochemistry, external quality assessment, proficiency testing, quality failures

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.22.11.5285(2025)

Abstract

This study evaluated the outcomes of external quality assessment (EQA) programs in clinical biochemistry and explored factors contributing to unacceptable results. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 240 laboratories participating in five consecutive EQA rounds (October 2024–February 2025), covering 15 biochemical parameters. The Chi-square test was employed to determine statistically significant differences between groups. Unacceptable outcomes varied across methods and rounds, primarily linked to equipment malfunction or insufficient calibration and maintenance, use of third-party reagents, and lack of validation. Over 90% of samples met requirements for temperature and transport conditions before analysis. However, many laboratories continued to operate open systems and did not provide complete information regarding the validation of use. Most laboratories conducted reviews when discrepancies were detected, used the SDI index for evaluation, and participated in continuous training. The findings indicate that the EQA program contributes to standardizing procedures and enhancing the reliability of clinical biochemistry laboratories. These findings highlight the role of EQA programs in standardizing laboratory practices and improving reliability in clinical biochemistry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bais, R., Vassault, A., Blasutig, I. M., Dabla, P. K., Lin, J., Perret-Liaudet, A., Thomas, A., Cendejas, K. A., Wheeler, S. E., Giannoli, J. M., Meng, Q. H., & Amann, E. P. (2024). External quality assessment performance in ten countries: an IFCC global laboratory quality project. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 62(12), 2435-2443. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0859

Bishop, M. L., Fody, E. P., & Schoeff, L. E. (Eds.). (2010). Clinical chemistry: Principles, techniques, and correlations (6th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (2003). Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measurement procedures: A statistical approach (CLSI Guideline EP06-A).

International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO 13528:2022 – Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparison. ISO.

Mercan, F., Serdar, M., Senes, M., Konukoglu, D., Inal, T., Alatas, O., Pinar, A., Savci, Ö., Güven, M., Gündüz, M., Eğin, E., Tipioğlu, Y., Tekin, A., & Yucel, D. (2019). National External Quality Assessment follow-up: 2010–2017 Turkish experience. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 44. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2018-0464

Sciacovelli, L., Zardo, L., Secchiero, S., Zaninotto, M., & Plebani, M. (2003). Interpretative comments and reference ranges in EQA programs as a tool for improving laboratory appropriateness and effectiveness. Clinica Chimica Acta, 333(2), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-8981(03)00188-8

Simundic, A. M., & Lippi, G. (2012). Preanalytical phase--a continuous challenge for laboratory professionals. Biochem Med (Zagreb), 22(2), 145-149. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2012.017

Published

2025-11-28

Issue

Section

Articles